Tuesday, March 14, 2023

The Segulah of Rabi Matya ben Charash - A Testimonial

 

I am here to offer a free business opportunity -


You know how these days everything Jewish is sold in pre-packaged kits – arba minim sets, bedikas chametz kits, 44-piece Chanukah oil kits, tefillin accessories kits, etc. Well, I have a great idea for another pre-packaged Jewish product gimmick that will sell like felafel here in Eretz Yisrael and in frum communities world-wide. Personally, I am beyond the stage of entrepreneurship, so I don’t plan on doing it myself. Instead, I am offering it to the world. Anyone who wants…here’s your chance!


All you need are medium size aluminum baking pans, lots of tea candles, books of matches, and an instruction guide.


What do I want to sell?


I want to sell pre-packaged Matya ben Charash Segulah kits. Guaranteed to work, or your money back!


I’ll give a testimonial – it worked for me. Actually, I am obligated to give the testimonial. It’s part of the segulah. And this is why I am writing this post. Since I happen to have a public forum, I have no excuse not to use it to publicize the “yeshuah”.


Okay, I am a little ahead of myself, so let’s discuss who was Matya ben Charash and what the segulah is.


For most of us, all we know about Matya ben Charash is his profound advice in Pirkei Avos:

רבי מתיא בן חרש אומר, הוי מקדים בשלום כל אדם. והוי זנב לאריות, ואל תהי ראש לשועלים.

Rabi Matya ben Charash says – One should initiate in greeting any man; and it is better for one to be the follower of lions than to be the leader of foxes.


He also has an appearance in Yoma 4b and later, in Yoma 83a (Mishna 8:6), he gives us some medical advice, but that’s about all.


Okay. He can give good advice, but who was he really?


The sources say that he was a post-churban Tanna and a contemporary of Rabi Shimon ben Yochai and the Bnei Beseira. He tried to run away from Eretz Yisrael but initially turned back. Subsequently, he emigrated to Rome and established a renowned yeshiva there.


I found one source that says that it was due to his absence from Eretz Yisrael that we don’t have any Halachic statements in the Mishna in his name. Nevertheless, it is claimed that he is buried in the town of Eilabun in the Galil. I find this to be a bit paradoxical.


Anyway, for those of us connected with Jewish legend (agadata) and mussar, there is a well-known powerful story about Rabi Matya ben Charash (Yalkut Shimoni Torah 161). The story goes as follows:


RMBC was in the Beis Midrash studying with fervor and his face shone because he had never gazed at a woman. The Satan just happened in (to the Beis Midrash??) and was envious of his purity. The Satan requested permission to test him which was granted. Hence. he made himself look like a beautiful woman and passed in front of him (very slowly). Rabi Matya ben Charash turned away but “she” kept making new passes in every direction. Finally, he ordered his student to bring him a nail and he poked out his eyes. HKBH immediately ordered the Angel Refael to come and heal his eyes. RMBC initially refused but finally relented when he was told that he would not be put to the test ever again.


The Book of Gilgulim claims that he was a gilgul of Palti ben Layish who, upon the orders of Shaul HaMelech, lived with Shaul’s daughter Michal even though she was Halachically betrothed to Dovid. Even though Palti made it his business not to touch her, he still could not abstain from looking at her and so this needed to be rectified in the person of RMBC. It continues that both of them were gilgulim of Yosef HaTzadik. In fact, the story of the nail is stated in Yalkut Shimoni in reference to Yosef.


Because of this, it is known to be a big segulah that anyone who suffers from vision problems should visit his (alleged) kever in Eilabun and daven there and should have a yeshuah in his/her eyesight.


This is what we know about the Tanna Rabi Matya ben Charash – but that segulah is not the one that I’m discussing here. The widely known, and practiced, segulah that I want to discuss is the one of eighteen candles.


Before I describe the segulah, it is important to remind everyone that only HKBH can help us with anything. All our tefillos go straight to Him. When we daven at one’s kever or in their zechus, all we want to do is to invoke their merit to help us with our tefillos. One must never lose sight of this.


The segulah of Rabi Matya ben Charash works likes like this. One gathers eighteen candles to one spot. He, or she, lights one candle and announces that it is l’iluy nishmas the Tanna Matya ben Charash. Thereupon, he/she recites chapter 86 in Tehillim. The person then lights the next candle for the merit of RMBC and, once again, recites chapter 86. This is repeated for a total of eighteen times.


Then the petitioner goes to chapter 119 of Tehillim and recites the alphabetic sections that correspond to the letters קרע שטן (kuf-resh-ayin-shin-tes-nun).


After this, the petitioner davens to HKBH for His help and salvation on a specific issue that needs to be addressed in the zechus of the kedusha of this great Tanna.


That’s about it, but there is just one more thing. The petitioner should accept on himself that when he has a yeshuah, he/she will publicize it.


Incidentally, it is always a good idea to embellish such a segulah with a few coins to the tzedakah box. Some people put in a coin or two beforehand, and some after, and there are those who put in something like a shekel as part of each recital, eighteen times.


This segulah has been gaining awareness and popularity over recent years and people like me are saying that it really helps. As such, I thought it may be a great business enterprise to package it all up in one kit and sell it on the open market.


Go right ahead. I won’t even ask for royalties.


As I wrote above, the true purpose of this post is not to give people business advice. Based on my business record, I am the last person to give financial advice. (Of course, when we look at paradoxes such as that most marriage counselors are products of failed marriages, I may be the best person to give business advice.) The purpose of this post is to use my forum to publicize the great yeshuah that I so far obtained after I undertook the segulah of Rabi Matya ben Charash.


I say “so far” because the episode is far from over and there is no telling where it will stand when the music stops. Nevertheless, the mere fact that it stands where it does, at this point in time, is itself a great yeshuah. I continue to daven for a happy ending when all the dust settles, but there is still a whole lot of dust flying around.


It is acutely appropriate to discuss this in my blog because this yeshuah relates to the things I have written in this blog. As you might guess, it has to do with the never-ending Malka Leifer episode and the long-standing feud that I have been having with the now-defunct organization known as Jewish Community Watch (JCW), its astute and pious leaders, Meyer Seewald and Shana Aaronson, and subsequently with the accusers of Malka Leifer (the amazing Sapper sisters) and a biased Israeli judge.


Note that I provided an update regarding the Malka Leifer episode and JCW in my previous post.


I am a bit ambivalent where to go from here. If I tell over the story with all the relevant details, this post will grow into another very long megillah. If I only give the basics, it may come across vague. The best thing is to keep it as brief as I can and, if need be, to elaborate in some future posts.


Those who follow my blog know that on the one hand, I am bucking the tide. On the other hand, the chareidi and Halachic position is typically not the most popular one. I stand for such values as presumption of innocence, burden of proof, looking at the whole picture, sticking with the guidelines of Chazal, and Kedushas Eretz Yisrael. I can attest that from all of my detractors and even some very learned Jews, these values are in short supply.


There is no glory in promoting very unpopular positions just because it happens to be the perspective of our Halacha and mesora – which alone is intrinsically unpopular. As others have said, “It’s a thankless job, but someone has to do it.”


Throughout this episode, numerous people have respectfully told me that they disagree with my position, but not a single person has been able to tell me what is wrong with my position and in what way their opposing position concurs with the Halachic sources that I (and all of us) rely on.


אין חכמה ואין תבונה ואין עצה לנגד ה


Alas, we find in our midst some patronizing people who believe they are above the rules of Halacha and that age-old statutes do not apply to them or to their mighty task of doing in bad guys. As such, they have no boundaries. I described these types of people at length in my 2017 post Victim Turned Predator.


These people cannot face up to the restrictions that the Torah places on their activities and need to find any means to justify what they do. As part of this impulse, they believe that it is a G-d given mitzvah to defame, discredit and deplatform anybody who inhibits their glory and agenda by preaching what the Torah really says.


If the truth would be on their side, they could use it to legitimately refute opposing viewpoints. But, since it is not, and they have no legitimate disputation, they resort to demonization and character assassination.


This is precisely the level that Meyer Seewald and Shana Aaronson of JCW and Magen L’Kehillot HaYehudiyot, respectively, stooped down to as I was writing my series of posts about Malka Leifer. They were unable to legitimately refute my position and they were too intimidated by it to just ignore it, so they felt compelled to compose a defamatory and demonizing article about me and post it on their website. I alluded to this in some previous posts (HERE and HERE).


The defamation was so malicious and JCW was so obstinate about not removing it that I eventually decided that this needs to go to Beis Din. Due to numerous technical difficulties, Beis Din was not feasible, and I obtained permission to take it to court. After JCW ignored the requisite cease and desist warnings, I had no choice but to proceed with the suit.


Instead of retracting or settling, JCW chose to distract the court with a countersuit. There was nothing written about JCW or the Sapper sisters that was not true and legitimate – which does not meet the threshold of defamation - but, nevertheless, they cherry-picked some true criticisms and a few cynical remarks from about 5 or 6 of my posts and pulled them out of context and recruited the Sapper sisters to file a countersuit as maligned “victims”. 


They engaged some high-end lawyer from one of Israel’s largest and costliest law firms. I am assuming that JCW footed the costs and paid for all this with money from their donors. They can correct me if I am wrong.


There is a well-known witticism: A good lawyer knows the law. A great lawyer knows the judge.


I don’t think the lawyer had any special connection to the judge, nor do I think he is such a great lawyer. He didn’t need to be. She (the judge) was a better lawyer than he was. And she certainly “knows” the judge.


In my very humble opinion, the judge in this case was overtly biased, untruthful, irrational, unethical and hypocritical. This is a verbose way of saying that she was (and is) agenda driven. I believe that she was overstepping her authority and overstepping the law and she was certainly overstepping the halacha which, in her ruling, she claimed to uphold.


The judge invested 48 pages in a very flawed ruling replete with falsehoods, inaccuracies, and double standards. Her ruling was basically one long and irrational criticism against me for trying to dan l’kaf zechus an accused sexual offender because she strongly believes that accused sexual offenders should not be defended. She as much as said so.


Of course, she believes this. She’s only been a judge for about five years. Prior to that, she was a prosecutor for fifteen years! A prosecutor does not believe in presumption of innocence. A prosecutor is paid to incriminate people they don’t know regardless of whether they are truly guilty or not.


Hence, due to her personal bias and inherent presumption of guilt, she rationalized JCW's defamation against me and, simultaneously, callously dismissed all the legal defenses which were (to an unbiased person) clearly in my favor. In order to dispel the fact that I presented the Halachic perspective, the judge pretended that she understands and respects the Halacha and drummed up some irrelevant sources in a feeble attempt to show that the Halacha is “debatable”.


At the end of it all, she used her twisted logic to incriminate me for presenting the Halachic perspective and to whitewash their defamation against me. To chastise me, she awarded a very inflated judgement to Dassi Erlich and a few thousand shekels to Meyer Seewald and slapped me with legal fees for both cases. All of this worked out to the shekel equivalent of almost $100,000.


She also ordered me to remove entire op-ed posts based on the marginal frivolous complaints that could be and were edited. This is blatant censorship and beyond the authority of the court. She had no problem with the JCW article against me because, even though she conceded that it is defamatory, in her rationale it was “justified” defamation. Her words were, "It wasn't more harmful than was called for". I am at a loss to figure out why intentionally harmful banter is ever called for. 


This is where I was at the end of October, 2022.


Now this sum happens to be a lot of money. It’s more than I have in my bank account (which is in heavy overdraft), so I am not very interested in paying it. Especially as I see it as being unjust and unjustified, I don’t think it should be paid. Not only that, as I wrote earlier, the ruling was flawed in many ways. (I wrote above that it is just too overwhelming to elaborate in this post. If there is a need and interest, I may follow up with more details in future posts.) There are clearly solid grounds for an appeal.


There are two things one requires to file an appeal:

  • A seasoned lawyer who is geared for handling an appeal

  • Money to pay such lawyer and other legal costs


An appeal in a civil case must be filed within 60 days of the ruling. The lawyers who represented me in the double case were quite busy and did not want to take on the appeal. So, as of late October, I had neither a lawyer nor money.


No sweat. I have HKBH.


The truth is, one thing there is no shortage of in Eretz Israel is lawyers. I shopped around and got some leads but, surprise of surprise, they all wanted to get paid. (There is a very big shortage of pro bono lawyers.) I had some ideas of how to get a hold of some money, which primarily consisted of begging, borrowing and crowdfunding. None of which guaranteed success.


Regardless - אין לנו לסמוך אלא על אבינו שבשמים


So, I turned to Him. But, to give it an added boost, I endeavored to enlist the help of Rabi Matya ben Charash. So, one day in November, my wife and I undertook the segulah of Rabi Matya ben Charash – the eighteen candles and reciting perek 86 and all the trimmings. I needed to get an appeal filed within [less than] 60 days and I needed HKBH to help me.


It all happened.


Firstly, I was introduced to a young energetic and religious lawyer who understands the case, understands this judge, understands the system, and knows how to handle it. He gave me a reasonable price offer but needed to know that the money will be there.


Very shortly thereafter, one generous benefactor, who has helped me in the past, offered to cover about two thirds of the expenses. That was all I needed to get started and to meet the preliminary court expenses and mandated security bond.


We got the appeal filed on time and we immediately applied for a “stay of execution” (עיכוב ביצוע הליכים). The stay of execution is a request that the initial judgement is not enforceable until after the appeal is decided. This is necessary because it is not automatic that when one files an appeal, the initial judgement is frozen and does not need to be carried out. If a stay of execution is not granted by the court, the victorious party can enforce the judgement even while the appeal is in progress.


In our case, we did not get an official response from the court on the stay of execution, but the court did order the other parties to respond to the appeal and set a date for oral arguments. This means that the appeal is taken seriously and has preliminary merit. As far as the stay of execution goes, since the court did not address it, then the sides maintain the status quo and the initial judgement is frozen ipso facto.


The beauty of all this is that not only is my [alleged] money staying put for the time being but, also, I am not forced to comply with the first judge’s censorship order for the time being. Currently, all my posts are still up.


The last yeshuah on the list is that the initial defamatory article against me finally came down. Since 2017, it was parked in the News section of JCW’s original website. JCW refused to voluntarily take it down, even after the case went to litigation. But ironically, as they rejuvenated their website and transferred virtually all the existing content and news articles into their new-look habitat, they very wisely refrained from transferring the defamatory article. So, for now at least, it is finally off the Internet. I expect it to remain that way. If it does not, I will continue to hold Shana Aaronson (the author), Rabbi Blau, JCW, and the new Jewish Australian webhost accountable.


To sum up, since the time I carried out the segulah of Rabi Matya ben Charash, I received funding for the appeal, found a capable lawyer, filed the appeal, obtained a temporary stay of execution of payment, retained all my writings, and have seen the defamatory post removed from the Internet.


Not a bad day at the office.


Yet, the game is not over. On one hand, I am still dealing with the Israeli court system. On the other hand, instead of a clearly biased, female, ex-prosecutor judge who ruled and manipulated the case single-handedly, I currently am facing an all-male, three-judge panel who, to date, are not showing any clear biases. Two of the three were never prosecutors. One of them was a prosecutor for only two years and this was more than twenty years ago.


None of this really matters because the ultimate Judge is the שופט כל הארץ. I don’t know where this case is going to go, but with the siyatta d’shemaya I’ve been having, there is nothing to worry about. This will have a happy ending and, bli neder, I'll be writing about it again.


 

השיבה שופטנו כבראשונה ויועצנו כבתחילה והסר ממנו יגון ואנחה

 

 


Appeal for my Appeal


My One Above and Seven Below project has always been not for profit. Over the years, I have gotten some meager revenues from selling my books, but they only served to offset the printing costs.


For all the years of my blog, I have never even thought of asking readers for any support or donations. I am not writing my blog for profit or glory, and I haven’t gotten any of either. I am doing it for all the reasons I wrote in the beginning of my book – to help people understand the Torah world and the Halachic perspective on current issues and to assist those who want to become part of it. It is all לשם שמים.


The generous benefactor who offered me two thirds of the expenses came through with his donation and with Hashem’s help, I have covered a lot of the remainder. I will manage to cover it all, IY”H, but I’m not there yet.


If any readers feel that they have gained from my blog and want to help me cover my legal expenses, it would be greatly appreciated.


Currently, I do not use PayPal due to their globalist censorship policies. I am only using Zelle. The Zelle address is:

1a7b.author@gmail.com


This address is also suitable to email me with inquiries and for further details.


Donations are not tax deductible. I do believe they are deductible from maaser but one needs to consult their own Rabbi.


Thank you.


Yechezkel


Sunday, March 12, 2023

Updates on Malka Leifer and JCW

 

I have an upcoming post in the works that is going to relate to the ongoing saga of Mrs. Malka Leifer and the role of the organization Jewish Community Watch (JCW). Hence, I thought it's a good idea to update my readers on the latest status of the Malka Leifer trial and the status of JCW. In my initial draft of the upcoming post, I included the updates as a part of it. This made the post too “bulky” and interfered with the flow. I decided to cut out the updates and to present them here as a stand-alone preliminary post.


Here are the updates:

 

Update on Malka Leifer Episode


My last post on this saga was posted on Sept. 19, 2022. It is probably one of the most comprehensive posts on the topic that I have written. If you are not acquainted with the case, it is well worth reading.


At the time, the only current update that I was able to present was that the trial had been rescheduled to begin on Feb. 7, 2023. Sure enough, the trial indeed commenced around that date which was about five weeks ago from this writing. At that time, several news outlets revived the episode and reported on the “opening volleys” of the trial. Click HERE for one example.


Since then, the trial was held in closed court for three weeks. There are some new articles over the past week which tell us the trial is back in open court. The court is hearing from the supporting cast (other teachers, Dassi’s ex-husband, etc.). These characters are officially giving the same testimonies that they gave in the committal hearing in Sept of 2021. I reported on it in this post from Oct. 13, 2021.


The amazing thing is that the extradition was based on an indictment of 74 charges. When Mrs. Leifer arrived back in Australia, 4 counts were dropped and 20 new ones were added to inflate the rap sheet to 90 charges. Yet, almost all of the current articles are claiming that she is standing trial for only 29 charges. How and why did 61 charges suddenly evaporate?


In a very recent development on March 6, the judge announced that two of the remaining 29 counts must be deemed not guilty for technical reasons. Apparently, these two charges relied on a law that was first implemented in the year 2006. For the charges to stick, it would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the offences occurred after 2006 implementation. Apparently, there is no such proof, so these two charges were officially dismissed. Now only 27 remain. While I am happy to see two of the charges dismissed, this update tells us something very disturbing about the remaining 27 charges and about the secular court system in general on two accounts. 


For one thing, these two charges were dropped because it could not be established that the alleged offenses occurred after the implementation. If that could be established, it would suffice. There would then be no additional requirement to establish an exact date and time.


This tells us that all of the 27 charges can be considered valid even if not a single one of them can be attributed to a specific date or time. In Jewish law, such a charge in a criminal case is automatically invalid because, for lack of a date, the accused has no opportunity to disprove the claim with an alibi. We call this  עדות שאי אתה יכול להזימה - testimony that cannot be refuted. 


Alas, our Western democratic world doesn't need to establish dates for criminal offenses. This infringes on any accused person's ability to defend themselves. This is one of many things to think about before praising the system.


The second disturbing point about this is that, in today's world, what defines a criminal is not what one does, but when they do it. These charges were dropped because, due to the fact that they were based on a new law that only took effect in 2006, this alleged event only became a crime in 2006. Before then, this same event wasn't [yet] a crime! 


There are new laws and mandates being created all the time. Tax mandates, insurance mandates, mandated reporting, mask mandates and vax mandates. Yesterday, it was a mitzva to go out and smile at everyone. All of a sudden it is a crime to go outside without covering your mouth. One can get fined for it. Before Prohibition, buying or drinking a beer was a-okay. During Prohibition it suddenly becomes a crime. After Prohibition, it's a-okay again. For all my years, buying, selling, or smoking marijuana was a crime. Now, it's all perfectly legal.


We live in a world where the rules of dating, mating and child-rearing have changed wherein anything that can be remotely considered aggressive or uninvited has turned into a felony. This is even though, "This is the way it was always done where I come from."


It's a lot like when my father (LOY"T) grew up in Munkatch. When he was born, he was living in a little house in Czechoslovakia. All of a sudden, in 1938, he's living in the same little house but it's in Hungary. Today, the same little house is in the Ukraine. The house didn't move. The borders did.


Back to the story. The prosecution officially closed its case on March 9 and it seems the defense may have done so a day later. I suppose that this means the case will be given to the jury over the coming week. From the news reports, the defense claims that they caught Elly Sapper in blatant lies and that, collectively, the accusers used the term, “I don’t recall” or “I have no recollection” over 400 times.


It must be noted that Mrs. Leifer continues to maintain full innocence. This means that all legal and Halachic principles of presumption of innocence are in effect. I want to remind readers who are skeptical and/or dismissive of claims of innocence that presumption of innocence works on two levels:


  • Total innocence, i.e., nothing at all happened and all the accusations are fabricated.

  • Innocence of degree, i.e., the accused may not be totally innocent, but may very well be not nearly as guilty as the accusers are making it out.


I have mentioned in the past that I personally perceive a reglayim l’davar that some degree of inappropriate activity took place. However, there is absolutely no reglayim l’davar that the activities were as extreme as they are being made out. As such, even if Level One (Total Innocence) seems far-fetched, Level Two is exceedingly probable. This is for the following reasons:


  • As a rule, just telling the story exactly as it transpired does not have enough “mustard” to bring the desired results. This itself is an incentive to embellish the details. Especially when there is nobody who can refute them (save the accused). I wrote about this HERE.

  • In the claims and affidavits of the defamation suit which I will discuss in the upcoming post, the Sapper sisters – and particularly Dassi Erlich - took the liberty to twist my words and to distort numerous facts. Once they actually did it in their suit against me, there is no reason they are not doing it in their accusations against Mrs. Leifer.

  • We also now have official testimony from Dassi Erlich’s ex-husband that it is his impression that the ordeal was taken out of proportion.


In any case, the trial is all but finished and there will likely be a verdict in a week or two. 



Update on Jewish Community Watch


If I am not mistaken, the very first time I wrote about JCW as an organization was in this post in July of 2018. At that time, I wrote, “Jewish Community Watch is a boiler room operation with a very impressive website.” At that time, there was much to criticize them about, as is elaborated in that post. Indeed, everything I mentioned was factual without any exaggerations. The facts were easily verified and irrefutable. And in case anyone wanted to refute me head-on, my comments section and personal email were open and available.


No such refutation ever happened.


My criticisms in that post were exclusively about how they do not conduct themselves in accordance with Shulchan Aruch despite claiming to have Rabbinic guidance. That post made no mention of legal violations.


In two subsequent posts (HERE and HERE) I noted that, in addition to their Halachic misbehavior, they are not exactly legal. They are flouting Israeli law since most of their activities were being carried out in Israel by proxy and they were not registered to legally operate in Israel. These facts were likewise never refuted.


Finally, in a more recent post, dated Feb 26, 2022 (just one year ago), I noted that their iniquities brought about their dissolution. Here is what I wrote:

Around April 2021 [Note- After reviewing my records, I now believe this occurred on April 1, 2020], Shana and the entire Israeli staff of the JCW/Magen alliance broke away to make Magen independent. As a result, JCW ceased all operations. Ironically, now Magen is active and JCW is defunct.


Yes, since what I now believe to be April 2020, JCW ceased all operations. They removed the Staff page from their website and went into hibernation. For almost three years, their website just sat there doing absolutely nothing. No new faces added to their Wall of Shame, no events, no updates. They did white out three WOS entries because, presumably, these three folks had died. I believe several others have also since died, but no other entry was removed. Their link to a donation portal yielded a domain name for sale.


They were totally inactive and presumed dead.


As such, I was totally shocked to discover on the last week of February 2023 (just about two weeks ago), that JCW took on a new webhost and rejuvenated their website. The new website is published by OS Solutions which appears to be a part Brooklyn and part India based outsourcing company. From LinkedIn it appears that the president is an observant Jew who, ironically, is a native of Melbourne, Australia.


The new website is solely cosmetic. It is exactly the same as the old website with a fresh new look. It solicits donations by snail mail or by telephone, but without any online portal. The three whited-out entries on their Wall of Shame are now totally gone but there are no other additions or deletions. Moreover, they still have no Staff page. Aside from that, virtually all the content is the same, even the typos from the old version.


There is one more thing missing. We will discuss this in the next post.


All told, JCW seems to have invested some money to give it a new look, yet it still looks to be as dead and inactive as always. There is nothing new on this website.


This begs the question: Is JCW open for business or not?


If they are, do they have a staff or not? Where do they operate? What do they do? How much capital do they have?


If they are not active, why the sudden new-look website with a new provider?


It looks to me that they are setting themselves up for a resurrection. I am just very puzzled that, what with all the baggage they’ve carried that put them out in the first place, and their lack of staff and resources, how is such a thing possible?


I suppose time will tell.


Printfriendly

Print Friendly and PDF

Translate