Owning our Mistakes (Toldos)

 

 

Our patriarch Yitzchok was not much of a conversationalist. His exploits in the Torah barely cover three Parshios. In one of these, Parshas Chaye Sara, he doesn’t even have a speaking role. In Parshas Veyeira, his sole speaking role is all of six words. The main point is three words: “ואיה השה לעולה?” – Where’s the sheep?

Yitzchak Avinu is very concise and says several profound things in very few words. And every word is measured. I just presented one example above from Parshas Vayeira. Here in our Parsha (Toldos), we hear a bit more from him, but still in very few words. Some examples are פן אמות עליה and הנה נא זקנתי. He doesn’t waste time on big talk.

Now I need to get to the point (I am not so concise) and discuss one of Yitzchak Avinu’s brief statements that tell us a very important message. Once again, he says it in just three words.

This is after Yaakov snuck in and received the brachos and then Eisav entered and asked his father to eat and bless him. Yitzchak asked Eisav who he is, and he identified himself as Eisav. The Torah says that Yitzchok shuddered and exclaimed, “If so, who was that that hunted game and brought it to me to eat before I blessed him?”

Okay, that statement was not too short. But he follows it up with a very curt remark: גם ברוך יהיה. “And he will remain blessed.”

And he will remain blessed. What is Yitzchok telling us?

Rashi explains: And he will remain blessed – So that one should not say that if Yaakov had not deceived his father, he would not have taken the brachos, therefore he consented and blessed him willingly.

From Rashi we see that Yitzchok is giving us a lesson for life.

We are all human and we all make mistakes. Most of the time it is because we are led to believe that the conditions or circumstances of a given situation are one way, and we learn later that they are different. The initial assumption called for a specific course of action and the updated condition calls for another.

In some cases, the conditions are not in error, but the mistake was an assumption or judgement that a specific course of action will yield the best outcome and we learn later that this is not the case. Perhaps there were other options which would have a better outcome. We call this an error in judgment.

To some extent, we can be excused for making a mistake for just as long as we were not set straight. But not for a minute longer. The minute we discover what we didn’t know until now, from here on in it is no longer a mistake. We need to take a stand on the updated conditions. We need to respond.

This need to “respond” makes us “responsible”.

This means that if there is still a way to remedy the mistake, it is incumbent on us to do so. We cannot say, “Oh, oops, I made a mistake” and walk away. To the extent that they can be corrected, we are responsible.

In many situations, nothing can be done. It is what we call “water under the bridge”. But, of course, we still need to assess the mistake. If it is a mistake that was better not made, then the one “responsible” at least needs to show some remorse. If it damaged another person and cannot be fixed, at least to apologize or perhaps to compensate. If it does not involve another person, it is an opportunity to learn and grow and take care not to repeat it.

Or, we can assess that even though it was not what we meant to do and if we would have known all the facts we would have acted differently, the mistaken path was actually the best course of action. We can give our stamp of approval on the mistake and stand behind it. Indeed, any mistake that we don’t remedy – when possible – or don’t actively distance ourselves from, like to apologize, should and is taken as a declaration that this is no longer a mistake. As of now, it has your full approval.

So, it may seem that this is the lesson that Yitzchok Avinu is telling us with his brief remark - We own our mistakes.

If we don’t approve of them, we must correct them or denounce them. If we do not correct them or denounce them, it automatically says that we approve of them and can be held accountable.

But it’s not just this. It doesn’t stop here.

I think anyone with any midos and yiras shamayim can figure all this out without Yitzchok Avinu’s help. A mature and responsible person takes responsibility for his or her mistakes.

Yitzchok is telling us a little bit more than that.

In our story, there were actually two mistakes. The first was Yitzchok’s mistaken impression that it was appropriate to give Eisav the brachos to begin with.

There are numerous opinions that explain his mistake. I recommend a very insightful newly released shiur from HRHG Yitzchok Breitowitz, Shlita, that I saw today. He points out that Yitzchok was no fool and knew very well that Eisav was no future Rosh Yeshiva. That was Yaakov’s job. But he was planning to give these blessings of wealth to Eisav to help make him a successful administrator and fundraiser to partner up with Yaakov. Rivka understood that Eisav would not use these blessings of wealth to help Yaakov, only to oppose him. As such, even the material bracha had to go to Yaakov.

The second mistake is that he thought he was giving the brachos to Eisav when he was really giving them to Yaakov. Why did he make this mistake?

Because Yaakov deceived him into thinking so.

The first mistake we can say was Yitzchok’s mistake. It was poor judgement, but it was his judgement. He’ll take responsibility for that.

But the second mistake wasn’t really his. He was deceived by somebody else. It’s not his fault. “Don’t blame me. I’m not responsible.” He could have told Yaakov, “You broke it, you fix it.”

But Yitzchok did not shy away. It doesn’t matter why this mistake was made and who triggered it. Now that I know that something didn’t go like I thought it should, I need to take responsibility. I need to make the decision which way this needs to go from this point onward. If I do not, and there are undesirable repercussions, I will have to answer for them even though I did not cause them. It’s my call.

Gam baruch yihiyeh!

It can be said that this is not the first time the Torah conveys this lesson. All the way back in Parshas Breishis, Adam and Chava ate from the fruit of the Eitz Hadaas and this resulted in the biggest disaster to confront mankind.

Adam’s excuse was: “The woman that You gave me, gave me from the tree and I ate.” It’s not my fault. She got me into it. (Note – See Baal Turim.)

Chava’s excuse was: “The snake enticed me, and I ate.” It’s not my fault. This creature talked me into it.

Excuses, excuses. And we know that it did not get them off the hook.

Perhaps Yitzchok also learned it from them. We own our mistakes even if it’s technically not our fault. Once we know the facts, if we can do anything about it, it is up to us. It’s our call. Our burden to bear. And if we don’t make any changes, it is a full declaration that we approve of the current status as if this was our position from the start.

Gam Baruch yihiyeh.

It is obvious that we are living in times of total turmoil. It is a time of birrur – distinguishing. Which side are we on? Where are we headed? Is this where we should be headed? If so, what can I do to get us there faster? If not, where and how to change course?

We are swiftly approaching what the evangelists call the “Day of Reckoning”. Reckoning means  דין וחשבון. The GR”A famously says that din is an accounting of what we did or did not do. Cheshbon is an accounting of what we could have done and should have done. This means what we could have done before our mistakes were made and what we should have done after our mistakes were made, regardless of what caused us to make them.

It is not only Parshas Toldos but it is also the first week of Kislev. The struggle of the Chashmonaim against the pagan Greeks was the easy fight. Their struggle against the Hellenist Jews was the bigger fight. To be honest, even up to now, we haven’t really won that one. It’s still raging. As I wrote in my previous post, we don’t know who our friends are and who our enemies are. Our closest relatives may be our worst enemies.

והסר שטן מלפנינו ומאחרינו

But Yitzchok Avinu is telling us something way more important.

Many individuals don’t even know who they themselves are. Deep inside they know it is the day of reckoning. But they don’t know what to do.

Each of us needs to take a stand and own our mistakes. Either make the necessary changes or take responsibility for not changing them. There is no neutral and there is no “Let bygones be bygones”.

Moshe Rabeinu said it at the eigel and Mattisyahu said it to the Hellenists.

מי לה' אלי – Who stands with HKBH come to me!

 

ויתן לך את ברכת אברהם לך ולזרעך אתך לרשתך את ארץ מגריך אשר נתן א-לקים לאברהם.

 

גם ברוך יהיה!

Brutal Betrayal

 

 

והסר שטן מלפנינו ומאחרינו

 

What do the events of:

• Abraham Lincoln
  
  
• The Titanic
  
  
• Pearl Harbor
  
  
• John F. Kennedy
  
  
• Apollo 1
  
  
• Sept. 11

• Covid 19
  
  
• Maui Wildfires
  
  
• Oct. 7 Hamas Incursion

Have in common?

Let us stay away from the term “conspiracy theory” which is conveniently used as a straw man to coverup the same type of false flag that applies to all the above incidents. A conspiracy theory is just that, a theory – an assumption or guess – about what really happened, which is expressed by those of us who see all the gaping holes in the “official narrative”. Those of us who aren’t blind.

But nobody makes up the “cracks” or gaping holes. They form themselves. The questions are self-evident, begging to be asked. The questions are based on the undisputed facts.

So, I am not coming to discuss any theories about what happened. I am coming to discuss the questions that are self-evident. And, I repeat, what do all of the events listed above have in common?

Of course, each event was a tragedy involving loss of life. Some of them involve only one or several individuals, and others involve hundreds and thousands. But they all have something additional in common. And that is: 

They were all left suspiciously unprotected – or, unsafeguarded. 

In each case, there was a clear level of negligence which enabled the event to happen. And the question in each case is: was it careless negligence or was it intentional negligence? And, if it was intentional negligence, what was the intent?

Let us briefly examine each case.

 

1-  Abraham Lincoln – There was only one person who was guarding President Lincoln’s private box at Ford’s theater that night. He was not one of the regular guards but a fill-in who long had a reputation for incompetence. He just so happened to abandon his post during intermission to water down at a next-door saloon and seemingly never returned to his post.

It is also worth noting that the alleged assailant, John Wilkes Booth, was hunted down and shot to death instead of being arrested and interrogated.

2-  The Titanic – The Titanic was only carrying 20 lifeboats which could at most carry half of the 2209 passengers aboard. Note that the Titanic itself had room to carry about another 1000 passengers, so, ideally, it would require even more lifeboats. Apparently, the maritime requirements at the time did not require more than that amount so it cannot be said they were out of compliance.

3-  Pearl Harbor – Not much to say here. There were plenty of warnings or, at least, strategic assumptions, that Pearl Harbor was vulnerable to a Japanese attack. There was nothing to protect the ships except the gunnery that each ship had. The official narrative is that the US Navy thought that the 4000 miles of distance was all the protection they needed.

4-  John Kennedy – There is no end of anomalies and questions about this event. Aside from the fact that JFK was totally unprotected from a potential assassin, the limousine certainly slowed down as it reached Dealey Plaza and slowed even more when the shooting started. Some witnesses claimed it even momentarily stopped. The driver was supposed to accelerate and swerve. Also, the Secret service guys are supposed to jump over to conceal the President and that certainly didn’t happen.

Also, like the Lincoln assassination, the alleged shooter was conveniently killed before he could be interrogated.

5-  Apollo 1 – The Apollo 1 disaster occurred on Jan. 27, 1967. Three NASA astronauts were carrying out a launch rehearsal for a planned launch on Feb. 21 when a fire broke out in the locked and pressurized cabin. It took five long minutes to get the hatch open from the outside and, by then, all three astronauts suffocated to death. There was no emergency release to the hatch from the inside and standard opening procedure took not less than 90 seconds. There was no fire extinguishing equipment on board and much of the interior structure consisted of highly flammable materials.

6-  Sep. 11 – Many folks don’t know that the US has an air defense system called North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). Its job is to track aircraft that are not where they’re supposed to be and make sure they do no harm. For some reason, on 9-11, after reports of four hijackings, the NORAD planes did not show up to work. It is reported that some of them were even out in Virginia holding a drill to deal with a situation exactly like the one that was going on in New York at the same time.

7-  Covid 19 – Immediately when this “pandemic” was declared I heard some off-stream sincere doctors say that we should take Vitamin C, D and Zinc which are all traditional virus fighters and natural immunity boosters and had been for decades. But from the mainstream media and big shot doctors we heard absolutely nothing. I’m talking about before any vaccinations were developed.

Shortly afterward, came Dr. Zelenko, ZTL and others who promoted hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin along with the vitamins. Amazingly, around that time, a plant in Taiwan which was known as the second biggest producer of HCLQ in the world, “spontaneously” went up in flames. Even Rabbanim and askanim who were so quick to publicly push the vaccines when they eventually came out, never breathed a word about V^C, V^D, or Zinc before, during, or after, and certainly nothing about HCLQ and IVM. Basic preventive treatments for viruses that were effective for years were denied, suppressed and ridiculed.

8-  Maui Wildfires - It’s kind of strange that the Maui wildfires didn’t burn the trees. Nor did they burn the commercial buildings or the multi-million-dollar homes of celebrities. They only burnt the homes of simple residents, their cars and their boats in the water. The elaborate siren system was silenced, and the water system was turned off. There is no telling how many people died and how many children were kidnapped.

9-  Oct. 7, 2023 – In this horrific event, there are just too many questions to deal with. Where was the IDF? Where were the Apache attack helicopters? Where were the cameras and motion detectors?

Well, most of the IDF was redeployed to the West Bank without leaving a significant replacement force. The Apache helicopters were sitting on their pads with their pilots at the ready for hours, listening to the nearby explosions and gunfire, waiting for the orders to deploy. Those orders didn’t come. Cameras and sensors were manually removed from the fence in the days preceding the attack.

In addition to this, we hear from village patrol personnel (kitot koninut) that their defensive assault rifles were inexplicably confiscated days before the event. Their inquiries and complaints fell on deaf ears.

Do you maybe see a pattern?

As I mentioned, the prominent common denominator for all these events is that the target of the attack was left exceedingly defenseless and vulnerable. But the two most recent events, the Maui fires and Oct. 7, stand out from the first seven. In the first seven cases, there were basic safeguards that could have and should have been implemented and just were not. There are no fingerprints to prove that it was anything more than careless human error.

In the Lincoln assassination, it may really have been a lone wolf conspiracy and John Wilkes Booth just got lucky that the bodyguard got swooned. Apollo 1 and Titanic may also have been fluke accidents. And maybe Pearl Harbor was really a surprise attack. Since we do not see blatant human tampering, we can never know for sure.

In the cases of JFK and 9-11 as well, there is no overt evidence of tampering with safeguards. They just weren’t there at all. It is only due to many additional anomalies that make it evident that these were planned deep state operations.

But Maui and Oct. 7 are different. In both cases, there was an elaborate system of warning devices and remedial infrastructure. Like, in Maui, there was running water and fire hydrants in Maui up until the day of the fires. Inexplicably (maybe), on the day of the disaster, these devices were manually disabled and neutralized. In the case of Maui, simple escape by auto was blocked by the law enforcement authorities. On Oct. 7, the army, attack helicopters, and even the news services were held back for many hours.

This was all done by people. Even though all events are ordained by Heaven, this was no “act of G-d”. It was done deliberately by people (I can’t call them human beings and I am not even talking about Hamas) who knew exactly what they were doing. It was all planned.

Many people are not aware of the facts of the Supernova Peace festival. They assume that this is some yearly event that we hold in Israel every year. Just, this time, it went haywire.

This is not the case. It was a one-time first-time event imported from Brazil. It was billed as the "first time" the Brazilian psy-trance festival, Universo Paralello was held in Israel. So the event was “brought” to Israel from Brazil. This was no coincidence.

I hunted down some of the advertisements for this event going back to August 2023. I was looking for the ad to tell us two things: (1) Where this event will be located? and (2) what is the price for entry?

On the ads, there was absolutely no mention of either one, although they wrote where to buy tickets (and where not to). I thought this was very peculiar. I heard that the event was initially scheduled to take place in some park or convention center in Tel Aviv. Then, shortly before the event, the participants were told it would be held in Moshav Lachish. Moshav Lachish is a bit southeast of Kiryat Gat and is a good 16.5 miles away from the nearest point in Gaza. This is a relatively safe distance.

About two days before the event, it was mysteriously relocated to Kibbutz Reyim. This is a mere 3.6 miles (about 5 KM) from the Gaza fence. I heard that the participants were not even notified about this change until the opening day of the event.

So, at the “last minute” this one-time event was suddenly relocated to an open tree-less field a mere 3.6 miles from the nearest Gaza fence. This, at a time when we were aware of rising tensions in Gaza. This place had absolutely no rocket or bomb shelters save for some concrete kiosks (sheds) spread around for a rocket emergency which can hold maybe four people. Nothing more.

And everybody obediently showed up to party without any concerns.

Now, let’s forget about some intricate concerted attack with paragliders and motorbikes and just talk about the standard everyday rocket attacks that Hamas has been throwing at us for almost two decades. There was absolutely no protection from them whatsoever. And isn’t this standard everyday tomfoolery? Wouldn’t positioning so large a gathering so exposed and so populated so close to the fence be an open invitation to a standard rocket barrage just for kicks?

Yet, there it was placed, and all the peace-loving shepselach naively poured in to ground zero. Incidentally, the reason I noted earlier that I am interested in the price for admission (I still don’t know it), is that I am assuming the price was particularly low and affordable. The “organizers’ wanted to make sure there was a big turnout.

So, we have an event that was imported to Israel all the way from Brazil and strategically placed within 5 KM of the Gaza fence with no trees or shelters and Hamas was just waiting for them with their entire attack totally planned out. For an event that officially wasn’t supposed to be there two days earlier!

Does anyone really think that this was all an unfortunate coincidence? That this wasn’t planned? Does anybody really think that all these people were not deliberately brought there to be slaughtered, raped and kidnapped?

Sure, HKBH brought them there. But, mind you, He had plenty of eager little elves helping Him out. They will all need to answer for it.

While I am in Reyim, I want to mention another thing. ZAKA announced that they had recovered 260 bodies. So we think that, from the partygoers, just about 260 of them wound up killed and that’s about it.

Not exactly. Aside from several more who were killed in ambushes beyond the grounds while they were trying to escape, we are now hearing that, just outside of Netivot, they designated a field to where they towed hundreds of totally burnt-out vehicles from the festival. When I say burnt-out, I mean really burnt-out. Maui style.

And what was found in these burnt-out cars?

You guessed it. Burnt-out people. People so burnt-out that they needed to call some teams of archaeologists from the digs in Yerushalyim to identify, not bodies, but charred human remains. Once the remains were found, they went to the task of identifying these ashes. So far (Nov. 9), at least ten bodies have been identified and they are still hard at work.

All told, like 9-11 and probably Pearl Harbor, this was no surprise attack. Hamas did not tactfully overcome our security systems. They did not “get lucky”. Our security systems were deliberately disabled. And they knew it.

By whom?

By those responsible for maintaining our security. It can be nobody else.

And who might these be?

There are four primary candidates – Shabak, the Mossad, the IDF, and our government – and all of them win the Oscar. All of them. Of course, Shabak and Mossad are the prime suspects. They are the ones who killed Yitzchak Rabin and tortured Amiram Ben-Uliel and saw to it that Jonathan Pollard spent 30 years in prison. But it is quite obvious that countless members of the IDF were in on it. And it can’t get past Bibi and the government.

It's not just that there were some turncoat collaborators. There must have been hundreds of them - all on our side of the fence – who aided and abetted this massacre. It could not have been pulled off otherwise.

In a very recent lecture (about 37:15), Rabbi Alon Anava displayed that there are a few very new members who joined the World Economic Forum, i.e., the New World Order elite. He displayed profiles that include the prime minister of Lebanon, the president of Iran, and then Bibi Netanyahu, Naftali Bennet, Yair Lapid and Ehud Barak. He claims that all these people are “new members” of the WEF organization.

I checked it out and I am not certain. The profiles exist but not under a heading of “Members”. It’s more under a heading of “People”, and all of these folks have been, or are, the heads of state of their respective countries for at least some amount of time. It may be just a list of profiles of world leaders and heads of state, but not necessarily officially affiliated with the WEF.

That said, there is no question that Bibi has appeared and spoken numerous times at Davos and has rubbed shoulders (and shaken hands) with Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, John Kerry, Albert Bourla and many other of, you know, the usual suspects. Oh, and did I mention that on Bibi’s trip to the US right before Sukkos, he had a meeting with Henry Kissinger, another Davos and WEF bigwig? This is the same Henry Kissinger that got Golda Meir to betray her people exactly 50 years ago at the Yom Kippur War. Bibi is also responsible for the 1998 Wye River Memorandum which resulted in a withdrawal from 80% of Chevron with all the requisite bloodshed. (Note - Dedi Graucher's popular song of Chevron Ir Havot was based on this event.)

There is no question that we are dealing with a brutal betrayal from our own leaders. This much is evident from the gaping holes – both in the "story" and in the fence. Yet, to point fingers at exactly who and exactly why, brings us to the realm of theory – ye olde conspiracy theory. Still, it is hard to imagine that the Global New World Order elite – the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers a few royal families and Soros and Gates and the Vatican, et al - who always benefit from war and chaos and who have all world leaders in their pockets, are not pulling the strings here.

Certainly, as Rabbi Alon Anava repeatedly tells us, it is ultimately all Yad Hashem. HKBH does what He wants whether we like it or not. But those who carry it out His "unpleasant" work are doing it on their own free will. They want it as much as He does (even more).

We say each night at maariv:

והסר שטן מלפנינו ומאחרנו

Hashem should remove the Satan that is both in front of us and in back of us.

What is the meaning of “in front of us” and what is the meaning of “in back of us”?

Long ago, I heard an explanation that sometimes the yetzer hara tests us with actions that are clearly forbidden. The test is right “in front of us”. We know it’s wrong, but we are tempted. Will we succumb or not?

But sometimes he confuses us and makes things harder. He disguises the infraction to make us think we are actually doing the right thing. He disguises the infraction as a mitzvah. This is “in back of us” or where we cannot see it for what it is. So we ask Hashem to protect us from sins we can recognize (in front) and from sins that we cannot (in back).

That is an old, long-standing explanation. But now I just conceived a new pirush. “In front of us” means our sworn enemies. “In back of us” refers to our friends and leaders who supposedly “have our backs”. Our “protectors”.

We daven to Hashem to protect us both from our obvious enemies and from these traitorous “friends”.

We have met the enemy, and he is us!

ואין לנו להשען אלא על אבינו שבשמים

New World Order - Part 2: When Did it All Start? And What is the End Game? (Noach, Lech Lecha, Vayeira)

 

I have written in the past that, amazingly, the Jewish day school I attended did not teach Chumash until third grade. And even then, they only began at Parshas Lech Lecha. As such, I had learned about Darwinian evolution through secular media, like television and magazines, even before I knew about the six days of Creation.

On top of that, in my childhood, I had also learned some of Rudyard Kipling’s Just So Stories. For those who weren’t born last century, Kipling’s Just So Stories are fanciful post-Darwin mythological tales that seem to complement “Origin of Species”. They have titles such as “How the Leopard Got its Spots”, “How the Camel Got Its Hump”, “How the Rhinoceros Got its Skin”, “How the First Letter was Written”, and even "How the Alphabet was Made".

It's a child’s guide on how things got started. Only, a child has a hard time distinguishing between fact and fiction. Just ask any kid who read Where the Wild Things Are.

Eventually, I did learn Breishis and Noach, but the damage was done. A story is a story whether it comes from Rudyard Kipling or Moshe Rabeinu. So, to people like me, when we study Parshas Noach and learn about the Dor Haflaga, aka, the Tower of Bavel, it comes across as just another Just So story.

How the Camel Got its Hump.

How the Whale Got its Throat

How the Leopard Got its Spots

How the Alphabet was Made

How the World Got 70 Languages

Just So!

Sadly, even for many Jews who were taught nothing but Creation and always believed it and who are not children anymore, they still don’t get the story of the Dor Haflaga. They still think that its main purpose is to tell us a true account of why the people of the world speak many different languages. They think that it was a one-time historical event that occurred over 4000 years ago and is totally a thing of the past. Ancient history. Nimrod lived and died and nothing remains of his reign and his tower.

They are making a huge mistake. Nimrod is still here. He is alive and well. And the purpose of the story of the tower is to tell us about the “birth” of the Freemasons, the Globalists, the Deep State, the Knights of the New World Order. It is here to tell us that they exist, and despite all their sweet talk, they are up to no good, and that we must not comply with them.

Yep, the New World Order is not all that new. It’s actually more than 3500 years old!

Of course, many of us are either ignorant or skeptical about all of this. But let me say this:

Every single Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur, we say these words in every Shemona Esrei:

וכל הרשעה כעשן תכלה, כי תעביר ממשלת זדון מן הארץ

May all the evil be obliterated like smoke, as the malicious government is expelled from the Earth.

We say these words 13 times every single year, year after year. If you have been davening for ten years, you have said it 130 times. If you have davened for forty years, you have said it over 500 times. Have you ever stopped to think: Who exactly is this malicious government? What kind of government existed when our liturgy was first devised (at least 1500 years ago), and is still here today, and will remain until HKBH establishes His Kingdom over the world?

It can't be the Roman Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Spanish Inquisition, Czarist Russia or Nazi Germany. They're all gone. It cannot be the US, the EU or the UK. They weren't in power earlier on.

 

Well then, who is this "malicious government"? What makes them so exceedingly malicious?

The obvious answer is that it is the government of Nimrod. It is Nimrod’s one world government. They didn’t disappear. They were only scattered to 70 nations. Yet, there are those in all the 70 nations that still aspire to Nimrod’s plans.

And what makes them so malicious?

Well, for one thing, you and me don’t count. Remember what Chazal tell us that if a brick would fall off the structure and break, they would weep bitter tears. But if a workman fell off of the structure and died, they did not care. Everyone lives and dies for the state – the “Deep State”.

But the more important factor is that they don’t have the interests of the Creator in mind. The Midrash tells us that the Dor Haflaga was not fully united. There were three objectives that motivated the members to build the tower.

First there were the non-believer scientists. These folks either believed that HKBH left the world to work on its own (clockmaker theory) or they were plain atheists. They thought the sky collapses every so often and causes a great flood. The purpose of the tower was either to buttress the sky so it won’t collapse or, if it does, they can climb up into the tower and stay above water.

The second group were idolaters who simply wanted to keep their deities in high places. The third group were the ones that believed in G-d but wanted to banish Him from the earth. They wanted to wage war against G-d.

These are the Satanists. 

  

Whichever way, there was no place for HKBH in their city and tower.

The Midrash says that Avraham Avinu understood what was going on and stood against the “project”. Unity for the wicked is not a good thing. Aside from Avraham, three other people opposed the project from the start – Noach, the father of all humanity, Shem his son, and Eiver who was Shem’s grandson. All of these were ancestors of Avraham Avinu. They tried to convince the people of the world not to follow Nimrod, but Nimrod’s influence and might was too overwhelming.

All of the descendants of Cham and Yefes sided with Nimrod. Even most of the sons of Shem, including Eilam and Kedarlaomer, followed Nimrod. Only one person listened and walked away – Ashur. He moved North and built four cities of his own, presumably without towers.

Anyway, HKBH gathered a Beis Din of 70 malachim with HKBH as the Av Beis Din. this made a total of 71 dayanim. It was a precarious moment because this was high treason and, once again, the proper penalty was to destroy the world. But, since despite their treason, they were able to coexist as a society, the Beis Din paskened that, for now, we will merely disrupt the communications of the parties and let them be. Each of the 70 malachim came down and taught a bunch of workers a different language.

Nimrod’s power was severely weakened, and the one world government and Central Bank Digital Currency initiative was put on the shelf for the time being. But Nimrod still ruled over the world.

I noted in my previous post (NWO - Part 1) that Nimrod was subservient to Kedarlaomer. I would venture to suggest that this fact was kept between Nimrod and Kedarlaomer. As far as the rest of the world was concerned, Nimrod was thought to be invincible.

Why?

Noach took the special clothes that HKBH made for Adam HaRishon with him on the ark. When he wasn’t looking, Cham snatched them away. Cham gave them to his firstborn Kush who gave them to his son Nimrod. These clothes had drawings of animals on them and this caused all wild animals to cower from them. Whoever wore the clothes could catch and tame any type of animal. That is why Nimrod was thought to be the greatest of hunters.

In any case, nobody messed with Nimrod. This is how Nimrod got the entire world to join his tower project and to get involved in Molech and devil worship. With or without the tower, he wanted to banish HKBH from this world.

Noach soon died and Shem and Eiver relocated to Eretz Yisrael to learn Torah and stay close to HKBH. Nimrod didn’t see them as a threat since they kept to themselves and didn’t try to spread the Word of G-d to the masses. At least not in his territory.

But there was one person who did remain in Bavel and started preaching to the masses that there is an omnipotent Creator who calls the shots and is the only being that should be worshipped, and that Nimrod is as mortal as everyone else. This was Avraham the Ivri (Opponent).

Nimrod had his medical license revoked, had him censored and deplatformed, shut all his social media including his X-Twitter account, sued him for spreading misinformation and even gave him beachfront property in Maui and zapped him with a DEW (Direct Energy Weapon).

Nothing worked but, eventually, HKBH told Avraham Avinu to relocate to Maarava (Go West, young man. Go west.)

But Nimrod wasn’t deterred.

Remember the war of the Four Kings against the Five? Four kings from Iraq (Bavel) – Nimrod and his friend Aryoch – and from Iran (Eilam) – Kedarlaomer and his friend Thidal – came all the way to Eretz Kanaan to fight against the Sodomites.

Why did they come? What were they after?

Well, the Torah gives us the official narrative. They used to pay taxes to Kedarlaomer and they abruptly stopped. Kedarlaomer was coming to collect his money.

But, as usual, we can never fully rely on the official narrative. Ther is always more to the story. In my previous post, I noted that the tax revolt may have been the main motive for Kedarlaomer. But it doesn’t really explain why Nimrod came under an assumed name. I suggested that, initially, he was sent to do it by Kedarlaomer because the Kanaanim were from Nimrod’s ethnic crowd.

Without discounting that theory, I came to another suggestion. Something that the Torah didn’t want to tell us straight out but can be read between the lines.

Nimrod was after Avraham Avinu – plain and simple. He couldn’t care less about the Sodom money. That was Kedarlaomer’s fight as we said last post. But joining up with Kedarlaomer on the Sodom campaign was his golden opportunity to get Avraham Avinu. Avrohom Avinu was his primary objective all along.

I am thinking that Kedarlaomer wasn’t interested in capturing Lot and starting up with his cousin Abe. He was a Semite and had mixed alliances. He also knew that Avraham Avinu was no pushover and thus far, never lost a fight. It was only Nimrod who had the audacity to capture Lot so as to draw in Avraham. It was his plan all along.

We are told that when these kings whipped the Refaim, that Og escaped. He was a war refugee. How did Og (and apparently his brother Sichon) manage to escape when all these other Neanderthals got whacked?

I don’t think Og escaped. I think he was spared. I think he was purposely spared by Nimrod so he can capture Lot and then get Avraham to enter the war. Nimrod needed to crush Avraham in order to re-establish his New World Order.

He hadn’t given up.

The Torah tells us that Nimrod lost the war and got smitten but it doesn’t really tell us the he was killed. It only says that Avraham chased the remainder out to Syria. Either Nimrod was not finished off or, if he was, he had a son, also named Nimrod, who succeeded him. This Nimrod (whichever) actually came back and tried again.

Eisav got him that time and really killed him. But instead of taking out the Globalists, he just grabbed the fancy Adam HaRishon clothes and reestablished the New World Order in Rome.

Where do I get this hidden message?

In this week’s Parsha (Vayeira – Breishis 18:27), Avraham is pleading with Hashem to same some of the Sodom complex. He says to Hashem: ואנכי עפר ואפר.

I am afar (dust) and aifer (ashes).

Rashi on the spot explains – And I should have already been relegated to dust (afar) on account of the four kings and to ashes (aifer) on account of Nimrod, if not for Your mercy that sustained me.

Okay, there’s the four kings and then there is also Nimrod. And who is at the head of the four kings (at the start)?

Amraphel = Nimrod.

Avraham is saying I would have been ashes due to Nimrod and I would have been dust due to Nimrod. It’s all the same Nimrod from dust to ashes.

Now, here is something very scary.

Avraham Avinu first spoke about being dust עפר and then mentioned ashes אפר. But wasn’t the furnace before the war? Wasn’t the ashes before the dust?

Avraham Avinu is the father of Klal Yisrael. But he is also the Av Hamon Goyim. The father of the nations of the earth.

What is עפר (dust)?

ע-פר. 70 bulls. The seventy bulls that we bring on Succos for all of the nations. That comes earlier.

What is אפר (ashes)?

א-פר. One bull. The solitary bull that we bring on Shemini Atzeres for the Jewish people. That comes later.

Avraham Avinu is the father of the nations of the earth, so he has the attribute of ע-פר – 70 bulls of Succos. But he is also the father of Klal Yisrael so he has the attribute of א-פר – the single bull of Shemini Atzeres.

In Parshas Chukas, the ashes of the Parah Adumah are referred by both terms afar and aifer. But, notice something. In Bamidbar 19:9 it states:

ואסף איש טהור את אפר הפרה

And a pure person should gather the aifer of the cow.

Aifer אפר is associated with a pure person, with purity.

Later in Bamidbar 19:17 it states:

ולקחו לטמא מעפר שריפת החטאת

And they will take for the impure one from the afar of the sin offering…

Afar עפר is associated with an impure person, with impurity. Moreover, it is no longer called a parah (cow) but a chatas – object of sin.

First the seventy nations have their “chag”. We remain in the Sukkah. On the eighth day we come out of the Sukkah and celebrate our closeness to HKBH. But this is only if we distinguish ourselves from the seventy nations and stay separate. If we do not, there is no longer a Sukkah and no barrier between them and us.

Many people don’t know anything about this Globalist Elite and New World Order cabal. When people like me try to tell them it exists, the skeptics ask a very common question: If there is such a cabal, why are they doing all this? What is their ultimate goal? What’s the “end-game”?

Al I can answer is that this cabal is the reincarnation of the Dor Haflaga. Whatever their primary goal was then is exactly what it is today. They are the same people, so they have the same agenda. There is nothing new under the sun.

The reason the Torah told us about it isn’t a Just So Story about why we speak different languages. It is telling us who the ממשלת זדון that we beg Hashem to destroy every single year really are.

Like Nimrod, they want total control over the world. They want to depopulate the world with war, urban violence, hunger, and poisons – in the form of processed foods, fluorides, pharmaceuticals, and vaccines - abortions, sterilization, and promoting homosexuality and transgenderism. They want to impoverish us with inflation, all kinds of taxes and high interest credit and low interest savings. They want to kidnap and traffic human beings for fun and profit.

It's all them and it’s all by design.

Only Avraham Avinu stood on the other side. Avraham Avinu was able to distinguish between the afar and the aifer. We need to be the progeny of Avraham Avinu and stand against Nimrod and the world. We need to be separate from the nations and their anti-G-d New World Order.

כי ביצחק יקרא לך זרע