The Torah tells us: לא תעמוד על דם ריעך
The gemara in Shabbos 54b tells us:
כל מי שאפשר למחות לאנשי ביתו ולא מיחה
נתפס על אנשי ביתו באנשי עירו נתפס על אנשי עירו בכל העולם כולו נתפס על כל העולם
כולו
Therefore, if you are a G-d fearing Jew it is incumbent upon you to send the following text to Justice Minister Avi Nissenkorn.
For an email, in the subject field you can paste:
אסור להסגיר מלכה לייפר לחו"ל
Then copy/paste:
אסור למסור לישראל ביד עכו"ם בין בגופו בין בממונו ואפי' היה רשע ובעל עבירות ואפי' היה מצר לו ומצערו: וכל המוסר ישראל ביד עכו"ם בין בגופו בין בממונו אין לו חלק לעולם הבא:
- חושן
משפט שפ"ח ט'
or
אסור למסור האדם ביד עובד כוכבים בין בגופו בין בממונו. ואפילו היה רשע ובעל עבירות ואפילו היה מיצר לו ומצערו. וכל המוסרו ביד עובד כוכבים בין בגופו בין בממונו אין לו חלק לעולם הבא.
–
רמב"ם הלכות חובל ומזיק ח' ט'
Please copy/paste the
above text and email it immediately to:
Also, you should access Avi Nissenkorn’s Facebook page here:
https://www.facebook.com/AviNissenkorn
and paste the text into a comment in any post.
This won’t cost you a penny and the neshama you save may be your own!
Tizku L’Mitzvos!
For more information
on this shameful saga please see the following posts:
There is No Ex-tradition in our Tradition (MAIN POST)
Judging the Judges –Part 2: Kangaroo Courts and the Boomerang Effect
Please circulate this post - you can share the post URL by copying it from the browser address bar.
כל ישראל ערבים זה לזה!
Freilichin
Chanukah
Posts
26 comments:
A person who is a danger to society is allowed to be given over to goyim.
To yeshiva bachur -
You obviously haven't read my posts (I listed 5 at the end of this one) and I don't think you are really a yeshiva bachur.
Random question why do you feel the need to insult those that disagree with you?
Random Jewish answer (answer a question with a question): How much of the relevant blog material have you actually read?
All of it. But why rip people who disagree with you?
Excuse me, you claim that you read "all of it"?
Did you read the first six numbered points at the opening of Flirting with Danger? Especially number 5? And after that 6?
Very hard to believe.
I read all your posts start to finish and I highly disagree. (as do many many Rabbonim) A quick question though, why do you insist on insulting those who disagree with you? (it really is a simple question)
Yeshiva bochur, get over yourself and the supposed insult, and answer tzu dem zach.
>>I read all your posts start to finish and I highly disagree.<<
What, exactly, do you not agree with?
>>(as do many many Rabbonim)<<
So far, I haven't found one Rav who mattirs extradition outside of Eretz Yisroel. Would you care to identify one? (I am not talking about Tzohar "Rabbis")
I have no need to enter a debate with you on the topic. However a quick question if you would. Why do feel the need to insult those who disagree with you?
If you do not want to enter a debate with me on the topic, what was the purpose of your comment?
Simple to point out that while you are entitled to your opinion so is everyone else. However you seem to present all those who disagree with you as reshaim. That is my point. Just because you hold an opinion does not make it the only opinion.
>>Simple to point out that while you are entitled to your opinion so is everyone else.<<
Why do you need to point it out? Have I ever said otherwise? Where?
I do need to say one thing though, having an opinion is one thing, doing grievous harm to another Jew is quite another. Opinions are not sufficient.
>>However you seem to present all those who disagree with you as reshaim.<<
How so?
"How so?"
"if you are a G-d fearing Jew it is incumbent upon you to send the following text to Justice Minister Avi Nissenkorn" = If you do not send this text, you are not a G-d fearing Jew.
Hm-m-m-m. Interesting
The line you quoted came after the earlier two lines about the mitzva of לא תעמוד על דם רעיך
and the gemara in Shabbos how one (i.e. a G-d fearing Jew) is obligated to object to a wrongdoing. This happens to be brought in Halacha in Rambam Hichos Deos 6:7 and in the Smag.
G-d fearing Jews are those who uphold the halacha.
This is the foundation of my claim. But you don't feel the need to include that in your quote.
Is there a reason for it?
Also, I just noticed, you left out the word "Therefore" from your quote,
Do you know what "Therefore" means? Do you know why I put that word in there?
If you are quoting me, why do you feel justified to omit any of my words???
BTW, I did not call anybody a rasha. Just not G-d fearing. (Once again my definition of "G-d fearing" for this purpose is one who upholds Halacha, though it is not my only definition.)
Yup my point exactly
One who doesn't uphold Halacha is one again ascribing an aspersion to those who disagree with you.
You will notice that "yeshiva bachur" and I chose not to get into the halachic discussion here (others have done so in comments to previous posts), preferring to concentrate on your assertion that those who disagree with your interpretation of halacha are not G-d-fearing. The "therefore" part of your words is not relevant to this claim and was justifiably omitted.
You now seem to be saying that anyone who doesn't uphold your understanding of halacha is not G-d-fearing, in other words all those who disagree with you are not G-d-fearing.
>>"to those who disagree with you.<<
No. To those who disagree with the Halacha I quote.
Hey, you can make your own subjective interpretation of Halacha or even make up your own. Do whatever you want. I see halacha "pshuto k'mashma'o".
>>"You now seem to be saying..."<<
Don't tell me what I "seem to be" saying. Either I said something straight up or I didn't.
I would like to see a little intellectual maturity here.
I don't see this thread going anywhere. If you want to continue, my email is: 1a7b.author@gmail.com
So the Halacha is yours to decide...... Got it. The maturity you speak of seems to be needed from one direction only.
Oh and about insulting those who disagree with again?
As far as I'm aware this case is the first in history of a Jewish woman being accused of molesting girls. For this reason they have made this case so prominent. In all likelihood she didn't do as accused. The more likely scenario is vengeful haters trumped up these false charges.
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/alleged-sexual-abuser-malka-leifer-extradited-to-australia-656594
I already saw this news. Very distressing.
Until now, the people involved were only potential mosrim. Now, they are actual mosrim l'mehadrin.
Hashem yerachem aleihem.
Post a Comment